Identity as wealth

I read a story in The Guardian today about a native-born Texas man named Eric Kennie who, for various reasons, is unable to secure the state-approved identification necessary to comply with the rather stiff new voting laws in his state. He doesn’t own a car and does not drive, so he has no driver’s license. He has never traveled outside his native city of Austin, or even outside the state, so he has no passport. He’s never served in the military, never held a concealed weapon permit, and his only state-issued credential, an ID card, expired in 2000. For all the state of Texas knows or cares, he doesn’t even exist. And, at least in this election cycle, he and his vote will be as absent as if he really didn’t.

This story made me realize that an identity is a product, and it is not free. In fact, it is both expensive and valuable, which makes it a form of wealth. I have a passport, a driver’s license, credit cards, bank accounts and utility accounts in my name. I am licensed by my state as a certified nursing assistant, and it has my fingerprints on file from when I was licensed as a real estate agent. I own a business, a house and a vehicle, all properly licensed and registered and insured. I have a computer with an internet connection, so I am plugged into a variety of social media platforms. In every possible way one can provably and “legitimately” exist in this world, I do. And of course I am a registered voter.

All of this costs money, one way or another. Registering anything with the state always entails fees. Except being a voter. Or so I always thought.

Casting a ballot in any election, at least in my state at this time, appears to be free. When I show up at my polling place at a nearby elementary school, I have only to say my name and sign my name to show that I received my ballot—they don’t ask me to prove anything because my name is written on their rolls. I don’t remember what I had to produce to get my voter ID card (which I’ve never once been asked to show); probably a current utility bill and my driver’s license. It was no different from getting a library card or an account at the video store. I never considered identification to be a burden or a barrier because I’ve had a driver’s license and utility service for more than 30 years. Being unable to produce “proper” identification is completely foreign to me, entirely beyond my range of experience in this world. I take such things so completely for granted that I am baffled that anyone wouldn’t always have both. Must be nice to be me, right?

privilege

I never considered my state-recognized identity to be an expense, until now. I’ve always considered it a right rather than a privilege, but apparently it is more the latter than the former. Which is scary because privileges granted by the state can also be taken away by the state with the stroke of a pen.

I exist as a person and as a United States citizen with “certain unalienable rights” only at the pleasure of the state, and it could take all that away from me for any reason or no reason at any time. The state of Texas has taken away Mr. Kennie’s right to vote, essentially, simply because he lacks the means and the will to participate in American society in the ways the state believes he should.

I like to think that I have done everything right and nothing wrong in my life and that therefore I am perfectly safe from my own government, which is dedicated to protecting my sacrosanct “rights.” But this is merely a comfortable illusion created mostly by the unearned privileges I enjoy because of my class, race and (although I have never thought of it as such) wealth. I have all the protection that middle-class white money can buy—no more, no less.

So how safe am I, really? How safe is any one of us?

 

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “Identity as wealth

  1. You bring up a good point. I’ve read stories of many voters who are no longer allowed to vote because they don’t have the necessary ID according to newly enacted laws in several states. Early voting has also been curtailed, and voting places have been eliminated. All these restrictions were put in place to eliminate ‘voter fraud’, which mostly exists only in the minds of the people enacting the laws.

    • Voter fraud is, indeed, a chimera. These laws are trying to erase people, in a sense, and their not being able to vote because of it is merely a desirable side effect for the party making the laws because it silences their voices. I am not sure why American citizens should have to work so hard to prove who they are and thereby claim their “rights.” (I’m feeling a little bit cynical about that word today.)

      I just finished reading “The Winds of War” and am now into “War and Remembrance” by Herman Wouk, which is an exhaustive history of WWII. He has a lot of details about how the Nazis changed the laws in Germany to rob, disenfranchise and ultimately exterminate the Jews. All of it was done by the book, perfectly legal. First you take away their property, then their right to own it, then their right to work, and so on and so on until you can take away their very lives and nobody can stop you. It could happen anywhere.

  2. Good on you- thus is very hard stuff to think about and you have utterly nailed it. It is so terribly important- I am desparately hoping you get, is it, Freshly Pressed, with this post.

    • Currently Black American men are the population most heavily disenfranchised due to racial profiling, systems that create and purpetuate poverty and crime amongst minorities.

      • And when an entire population is disenfranchised, what choices does it have to make its voice heard? Coordinated violence against the system may be the last resort, but it seems to be preceded by a great deal of self-immolation, which is wasteful and tragic.

        It seems to me that those who are in a position of privilege are morally bound to extend their advocacy, their protection and their voices on behalf of those who don’t enjoy their advantages. One does not have to be gay to support gay rights or a person of color to support civil rights, any more than one needs to be an animal in order to support animal rights. Those who can speak, must speak.

        Whenever one group of people says to another, “that’s not in any way my problem, that’s exclusively your problem because I am not in any way like you,” that is only selfishness and myopia talking. We’re all in this together. The state cannot ignore/abandon/abuse/repress/subjugate huge swaths of its population and not expect a powder keg, someday, to blow. And that really will be everyone’s problem.

  3. Pingback: “That really doesn’t involve me” | Going Forward

We love comments! :-)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s